Wednesday, February 11, 2009

How To Get Sponsored Ski-doo

euthanasia


The Italian law punishes any criminal action aims to stop a human life even when it is in terms of suffering and near death. The debate on this act is called "euthanasia" has been greatly expanded in recent years, affecting not only families and professional groups involved in the care of terminally ill people but also ordinary people.

Il problema giuridico si identifica nell’interpretazione soprattutto dell’articolo 32 della costituzione che garantisce le cure gratuite agli indigenti ma specifica che nessuno può essere obbligato a un determinato trattamento sanitario se non per disposizione di legge. Da questa lettura risulta evidente come ognuno di noi possa rifiutare il trattamento sanitario e quindi anche rifiutare l’utilizzo di macchinari che possano mantenerci in vita in momenti di grave patologia.

Questo atteggiamento di rispetto della libertà vale anche per il rifiuto di idratazione e nutrizione, diritto che viene garantito per esempio nell’applicazione dello sciopero della fame, durante il quale il cittadino può rifiutare cibo e acqua fino al compimento estremo di lasciarsi morire. Sempre l’articolo 32 però consegna allo stato la possibilità di intervenire, e quindi di costringere alle cure un ammalato, quando questi non sia più in grado di intendere e volere o se esso sia sotto l’influenza di pressioni esterne: è il trattamento sanitario obbligatorio istituito e regolamentato dalla legge 180/78.

Il problema si complica infattii, quando ci troviamo in presenza di una persona non cosciente, cioè incapace di decidere e/o comunicare la volontà di sospensione delle cure, cioè in una situazione dove secondo la legge è lo Stato, in un atto composito di tipo medico e giuridico, a prendere le decisioni appropriate to the situation.

come into play four key issues and conflicting. The first reflects the fact that again in accordance with Article 32 of the Constitution the state must ensure the care, not death, and then for action to the interruption of life is not legally accepted. The second point however is that for the same article the constitutional law can not violate the limits imposed by respect for the human person and therefore can not force treatment on a life unworthy of living. Third is that to ensure this right to dignity is necessary to transfer the moral question of suspension of action on care ad una terza persona, quasi sempre il medico, che può porsi obiezioni di coscienza e rifiutarsi di compiere l’atto. Il quarto punto, il più dibattuto perché fondamentale, è riuscire a disporre di certezze sulla volontà del paziente.

Proprio su questo aspetto è stata proposta l’applicazione in vita del “Testamento Biologico” che corrisponderebbe alla volontà circa le cure che si intendano o non si intendano ricevere nel caso in cui non si potessero più esprimere di persona le proprie intenzioni. Ma un atto scritto, come anche il “consenso informato” all’accettazione del trattamento medico, non può che essere valido esclusivamente a ridosso the act itself.

How many times each of us has changed his mind being in new situations or with the wealth of new experiences? Ultimately the management of end of life if the patient is unconscious difficult to resolve. My opinion as a physician is to reject both the aggressive treatment, both the application of assisted suicide, always to respect the will if it is expressed at the time and focus all your energy to defend the dignity and remove, especially the patient unconscious every kind of suffering.

Massimiliano Fanni Canelles

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Show Me Wedding Cards Verses

a borrower BETWEEN MOON AND STARS

the welfare of a state is only visible in the mirror that reflects our freedom and that of neighboring peoples.

Massimiliano Fanni Canelles

"They between them and us, between us," this was the election slogan of Ehud Barak, Israeli Minister, who had centered his campaign around the idea of \u200b\u200bseparation between the Palestinian and Israeli . Today, a 9-meter-high wall separating the Palestinian Territories (West Bank and Gaza Strip) from Israel, but the escalation of violence and death on one side of the wall and the other puts the whole world on alert today. Decades of Israeli military occupation in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip and rocket attacks and Palestinians in Israel is the object of the extremists on both sides to destroy each other.
The Palestinians want to get rid of the occupier and his constant physical and psychological violence, the Israelis, in turn, want to get rid of the Palestinians they see as an impediment to the realization of a state coveted for millennia and can boast of being the only democracy in the Middle East nell'aera. Men, women and children sacrificed to an insane and inhuman logic, hatred, resentment and violence that plague today's increasingly moderate population only resource to the realization of peace in the land santa delle tre grandi religione monoteiste. Ma questo sistema, esasperando entrambe le popolazioni innalza ai vertici dei Governi i falchi utili alla strumentalizzazione del conflitto da parte dei fondamentalisti religiosi e politici.
Daniel Goldhagen, storico di fama mondiale afferma come l’islam politico guidato da Hamas stia mutando in nazismo il suo antisemitismo. “Le novemila parole della Carta di Hamas dipingono ebrei, israeliani e sionisti in modo manicheo, in conflitto non soltanto con i palestinesi, ma con l’islam. Le loro allucinazioni antisemite ricordano gli ideologi nazisti più estremi”. D’altro canto Jenny Tonge, appartenente British Liberal Democrat party, emphasizes the guilt of Israel have brought the Palestinians to the levels of third world by blocking supplies of raw materials and therefore the economy. Tonge accused the Israeli army had dropped out of school exams in Nablus, with the result of a generation of illiterate and unskilled Palestinians. Not only that, the great Israeli writer Grossman is expressed by criticizing the harsh tones 'and Israel racist attitude towards the Arab minority and accuses his government : "Extremist forces threaten the peace in the' whole region and perhaps in the world, but the primary responsibility for this is the most powerful and aggressive, namely Israel and its rulers. "
Just to give strength to the fringes moderate at this time the Egyptian government is launching a series of interviews with the two Palestinian factions (the extremists of Hamas and the moderate Fatah in order to resolve the crisis . Fatah - has reaffirmed the Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas - "will not accept any new agreements and refuse dialogue with rivals until they do not" put an end to the coup, will be set to accept all international obligations and to hold elections assets ". The proposal that Abbas has the full backing of Washington and Brussels is to take control of the border crossing with Egypt, where it seems to enter the military supplies that arm the hand of Hamas. A proposal immediately rejected by Hamas, which by mid-June has control over the Strip and claim his share of authority on the crossing of Rafah.
The seriousness of the situation becomes abundantly clear when they are constantly being deleted and hidden bi-national and multi-cultural alternatives. a drama in which it becomes increasingly difficult to take the necessary steps to maintain the dignity of all people, ensuring autonomy, authority and prosperity. A key area for the major monotheistic religions, but also for stability in world politics in which only a bi-national state, could in future be a peaceful solution. Two people and a group of people that you could propose a mandatory period of custody in which Palestinian children would be parents to live with Israelis and Israeli children by Palestinian parents.
A provocation? Utopia? Perhaps if we believed in the Holy Land all things be done differently ....

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Letter For A Babyshower

The truth about the economic crisis


"Dear Sirs, due to the failure of Lehman will not make its obligations BROTHERSle Lesar promises coupons and repaid the capital. "This statement came in milionidi savers in the world after the announcement of larger than bankruptcy in U.S. history. settembre2008 was 15. Some of us have been" woken up "with a cold shower, some have not understood anything, many do not know what happened and still cosapotrà succedere.Per understand the reasons for the current financial crisis èforse Lets proceed. Until a decade ago, anyone who wanted to get a mortgage was demonstrate possederele guarantees suitable to cover the amount.
In the U.S., however, in an increasingly open-minded, where everything is bought esi throws like dirt, people, families, businesses, Nonso most successful to ensure the coverage of goods materiali.Così debts with banks and financial institutions have had to find unsistema to keep alive the market most of their profit, the loan. Therefore, it was "invented" the split, the risk of mortgage occultamentodel: the bank granted a loan achi could not provide adequate guarantees issued contemporaneamentedei titles that sold on the market in order to cover dalrischio's insolvency. These securities, "filled" in debt, to be purchased were to be mixed with obbligazionistrutturate: the CDO (Collateralized Debt Obligations). Finaleè The result was that, years, pieces of debt, "spoiled" were virtuous abbinatia securities and sold on financial markets dell'interopianeta.
had been created the subprime mortgage. By authority of the supervisors, rating agencies and the banks themselves that avrebberodovuto monitor and assess the degree of risk of these prodottifinanziari have pretended not to see. Perhaps the pesanteconflitto of interest or for the power of money and those who possiede.In any case, these products are not seriously speculative maisto blocked. So much so that until the day before the bankruptcy, laLEHMAN BROTHERS was considered a reliable company! It is at this point comes the scoop: "financial engineering", because of circumvent the risk of these products, make Punta Credit Default Swaps or CDS. Chepermettono other financial products to transfer and credit risk relative to unatransazione between two parties.
Banks and other financial players, via the CDS, have each sold allapossibilità risks that U.S. citizens could not pay the mortgage ratedel. Insurance policies that is applied to the Marquises swap or sell securities. A parallel financial system, unreal, unsupervised, able to produce a new market of debt denarodai altri.Il title was therefore at greater risk rating dall'agenziadi reported that controlled the company that issued it, but heard udite.aveva una polizza assicurativa più costosa! Quindi, chiunquesapesse lavorare in questa assurda "finanza creativa", valutando iCDS dei titoli era in grado di capire il rischio e quindi l'affidabilitàdell'azienda che li emetteva.
Ma non solo, nessuno si è preso labriga di avvisare il consumatore. Perché? Forse perchè il volumedei CDS è passato in soli sette anni, da 2.000 a 45.000 miliardi didollari, una cifra paragonabile al PIL dell'intero pianeta? Certo, maanche perché l'enorme liquidità scaturita ha permesso il reinvestimentoin oro e petrolio o in materie prime alimentari: soldi natidal "nulla" si trasformavano per incanto in soldi sicuri e concreti!Un processo che ha causato, come we all know, the surge deiprezzi, the block of business, the distrust of banchee financial agencies, the failure of many companies selling more than sure this (especially the automobile factories, as laGeneral Motors) and the collapse of 100 million people under the sogliadella povertà.E we were told that it was China's fault! Meditate gente.meditate!

Massimiliano Fanni Canelles