First I thank all those who are contributing to the debate about competitiveness of the much-praised Marche economic model, and I would add a couple of food for thought more personal this time: it seems to me that these family firms are born as little more than small craft shops. The whole family is involved and directly controls all stages of processing. Once the idea nock and / or the right product, get bigger without changing its structure. The mentality remains craft, so the boss (and family) controls everything, do not delegate anything, and therefore the greater the size of the company plus the normal course of business slows. And if you do not fit in the end s'incricca!
And even vaguely feudal mentality, so the family was surrounded by vassals-managers who, in most cases never make critical analysis for convenience or because a vassal must not contradict the feudal lord, otherwise exile. Men who never can take into account the demands of the workers often, though, to see the first signs of letting up. To give a practical example: I work in a department where they are operating strictly to comb all the knots of the company. If something the system does not work, we see it now. Neither management nor the management have never wanted to listen to our warning, and even analyze the discomfort of many of the workers now that emerged from all sides. In fact, we were branded as defeatist. Imagine now that we finally began to protest (and it took us four years before losing patience and take to the streets), employees have accused us of being responsible for the defeat ... As if a disaster of this magnitude could be caused 5-day strike!
We can not even taste the bitterness of "we told you so"!
Marches in SMEs, not just the general feeling is that the employee is nothing more than part of a mass of interchangeable and should be thankful for the honor of being accepted in such company, until the owners decide not to close or sell (I have created, I will decide the tide) with no thought for the workers, for whom would rather precise social responsibilities.
In part because these patrons, these families of industrialists, have no perception of the value of their employees do not realize that, as the company still managed to craft level, many orders fail to be completed by employees who, every time that the mechanism jams, put us a piece. For a minimum fee later, notwithstanding the great professional preparation, continuous effort, so much overtime provided free of charge, maximum flexibility to cover periods of closure during the holidays, and the praises of leaders, colleagues and clients. Nada, niet, nicht! In their eyes we are worth 0: better streamline "the company's first operational firing, give subcontract tasks (often without analyzing the costs first, and then found to pay them three times) and take yet another overpaid superdirigente, which just always say yes (regardless of whether they might have already had devastated other companies, and is always ready to recycle everywhere, because he has the resume with the right schools, the titles right, the right contacts ...)
addition, SMEs are not taken into account in any responsibility and reciprocity of the contract work. Why should we thank? For giving us a job (even when we were old enough to work and training contracts "attractive" to many other companies, and there was no crisis that increases the competition among the unemployed) and then removed for bringing this to their incompetence? ? Many thanks when someone "gives" something. Unlike the feudal world, the relationship between employee and company are regulated by a contract that is binding on both parties: the employee works to its full capacity, the company puts it in the best condition to perform his work and it pays regularly. I and my colleagues our contractual obligations we have always honored and thoroughly, even after the company had failed to fulfill, I believe that if someone deserves your thanks, well that is up to us.
The emperor has no clothes, but you can not say ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment